Scratch+Game+Assessment


 * Effort Rubric: Investigate**
 * **8 = Excellen**t - I read the assignment. I asked questions of others students in class if I did not understand. I searched for good examples. I completed the Investigation section for the game assignment on my wiki page by adding active links to at least 3 projects that I had viewed. I wrote a summary of what I liked and did not like about each project that I viewed. This included the goal, measurement, reward, feedback of each program.
 * **6 = Good** - I read the assignment. I asked for help if I didn't understand. I searched for and viewed other examples. I listed what I liked and didn't like about at least 2 projects I viewed. This included the goal, measurement, reward, feedback of the program. I didn't provide a link to those projects.
 * **4 = Beginning** - I quickly read through the assignment and began to work. I only asked the teacher for help. I didn't view or evaluate any programs, or I did, but didn't provide a link or summary on the wiki.
 * **2 = Unsatisfactory** - I didn't understand and didn't ask for help, or I didn't complete the Investigation Stage/
 * **0 = Not done**


 * Effort Rubric: Design**
 * **8 = Excellent** - I used a graphic organizer to plan my program. The design included details for sprites, backgrounds, and the goal, measurement, reward, feedback for the game. I checked the requirements again to make sure that all requirements for the program were included in the design. I exported the design as a jpeg and uploaded it into my wiki page for the assignment. I placed it on the page in the correct location and resized it appropriately.
 * **6 = Good** - I used a graphic organizer to plan my program. The design included details for the game including the goal, measurement, reward, feedback. I exported it as a jpeg and uploaded it to my wiki page for the assignment. I placed it on the page in the correct location and resized it appropriately.
 * **4 = Beginning** - I used a graphic organizer to plan my program, but only included a few things in my plan because I didn't know what I was going to include in the program. I exported it as a jpeg and uploaded it to the correct wiki page for the assignment. I resized it appropriately.
 * **2 = Unsatisfactory** - I used a graphic organizer. My design included few ideas for planning the program. I exported it as a jpeg and uploaded it to the correct wiki page for the assignment. I resized it appropriately.
 * **0 = Not done**


 * Effort Rubric: Plan**
 * **8 = Excellent** - I viewed tutorials to learn new skills, I downloaded samples from the MIT website to see how the programs worked. I completed a detailed numbered list in the plan section on my wiki page. I helped other students when needed and when asked.
 * **6 = Good** - I looked for examples. I shared ideas and skills with 1 other student in class. I completed a numbered list in the plan section of my wiki page for the assignment.
 * **4 = Beginning** - I did not look for any new ideas. I completed a brief numbered list in the plan section of my wiki page for the assignment.
 * **2 = Unsatisfactory** - I did not try to learn new skills. I did not share ideas with others in the class. My numbered list only had a few steps.
 * **0 = Not done**


 * Effort Rubric: Create **
 * **8 = Excellent** - I completed the program including all of the technical requirements. I checked spelling and grammar. I did not include my name or photo or the name or photo of anyone in the class. I had at least 3 people in class view it before asking for permission to upload it to the MIT website. I included their suggestions for improving the program. I added the program to the correct ICSkids Grade 6 Projects gallery on the website without any help.. I added an **active link** to my project in the correct gallery on my wiki page without any help. If I used or remixed ideas from other students, I included an explanation and added an **active lin**k to the program on MIT.
 * **6 = Good** - I completed the program including all of the technical requirements. I checked spelling and grammar. I did not include my name or photo or the name or photo of anyone in the class. I had at least 1 people in class view it before asking for permission to upload it to the MIT website. I included suggestions for improving the program. I added the program to the correct ICSkids Grade 6 Projects gallery on the website without any help.. I added an **active link** to my project in the correct gallery on my wiki page without any help. If I used or remixed ideas from other students, I included an explanation and added a link to the program on MIT.
 * **4 = Beginning** - I completed the program including most of the technical requirements. I checked spelling and grammar. I did not include my name or photo or the name or photo of anyone in the class. I had at least 1 people in class view it before asking for permission to upload it to the MIT website. I included the suggestion for improving the program. I added the program to the correct ICSkids Grade 6 Projects gallery on the website with help.. I added an active link to my project in the correct gallery on my wiki page with help. If I used or remixed ideas from other students, I included an explanation and added a link to the program on MIT.
 * **2 =Unsatisfactory** - The program was started but not completed. No link was added to the wiki page.
 * **0 = Not done**


 * Effort Rubric: Evaluate**
 * **8 = Excellent** - I compared my design and plan to the final program. I explained what I learned, what worked and what didn't work as well as I wanted. I explained what inspired me. I discussed what I got stuck on and how I solved the problem. I mentioned what was added to the final program or what was left out of the final project and why. I explained what I was most proud of. I mentioned what I might want to learn next. I answered all of the evaluation questions below.
 * **6 = Good** - I wrote one or two sentences about my project. I explained what I learned and what worked. I answered all of the **Evaluation Questions** below.
 * **4 = Beginning** - I only answered the evaluation questions below.
 * **2 = Unsatisfactory** - I did not complete the evaluation.
 * **0 = Not done**


 * Evaluation Questions**
 * 1) What was the goal of the game?
 * 2) How did you measure progress?
 * 3) How did you provide feedback?
 * 4) What rewards did you provide?
 * 5) Which control commands did you use?
 * 6) Which sensing commands did you use?
 * 7) Did you use variables? Which ones and how?


 * Achievements Rubric: Data Management**
 * **12 = Excellent** - I completed the assignment as required. I exported the OpenOffice design as a jpeg and uploaded it to the wiki page without assistance. I got approval from Mrs. Carrier for my program to be uploaded. I uploaded the completed program to MIT without assistance. I added the program to the correct icskids Grade 6 Projects gallery without assistance. I added a link to the program in the gallery to //Stage 2 Create// my wiki page for the assignment. If I used or remixed portions from other student's work, I included an active link to the original student project and explained what I use. There are no spelling errors or grammar errors. I did not include my name or photo or the names or photos of anyone in the class. My work is a model for ICS.
 * **10 = Good** - I understood the assignment and completed most of the requirements for the program. I exported the OpenOffice design as a jpeg and uploaded it to the wiki page without assistance. I got approval for my program to be uploaded. I uploaded the program to MIT without assistance. I added the program to the ICS Grade 6 Projects gallery without assistance. I added an active link to the program in the correct gallery on my wiki page. If I used or remixed work from other students, I provided an explanation and link to the original work.
 * **8 = Beginning** - I understood the assignment and completed some of the requirements for the program. I exported the design from OpenOffice as a jpeg and uploaded it to the wiki page but needed help. I got approval to upload the program to MIT but needed help to upload it to the icskids MIT site. I added the program to the correct ICS Grade 6 Projects gallery but needed help. I added a link to the program on my wiki page. I provided a link to any work that I used or remixed from other student's projects.
 * **6 = Incomplete** - I did not understand the project and did not complete all of the technical requirements. I got permission to upload the program to MIT but needed help. I added the program to the ICS Grade 6 Projects gallery with help. I added a link to the program on my wiki page with help. I did not include a link to any work that I used or remixed from other students.
 * **0 = Not Done** -The wiki page is not done or the program is not added to the ICS Grade 6 Projects gallery. There is no link to the program in the MIT gallery on the wiki page.


 * Achievement Rubric for Game Project: Technical Requirements**
 * **12 = Excellent** - The project notes explain how to start the program and which keys to use. The goal is written on the first screen. The first screen explains how to start the program and which keys to use to control the game. The program is reset with a green flag so all sections of the game are in place for a replay of the game. At least one object (sprite) is controlled by the player. At least one object (sprite) moves independently. Game includes at least one instance of object interaction (this could include objects that respond to mouse clicks, or it could be two objects that interact with each other.) Game has accurate measurement scoring system. Game has clear feedback for victory/loss conditions and/or scoring. Player can interact with game to a successful conclusion. Game runs without errors.
 * **10 = Good** - Project notes explain how to start the game. The goal is written on the first screen. The first screen explains how to start the game and which keys to use to control the game. The program is reset with a green flag so all sections of the game are in place for a replay of the game. At least one object (sprite) is controlled by the player. At least one object (sprite) moves independently. (this could include objects that respond to mouse clicks, or it could be two objects that interact with each other.) Game has accurate measurement system. Game feedback for victory/loss and/or scoring is not clear, so player is unsure of progress and/or player cannot interact with game to a successful conclusion. Game runs without errors.
 * **8 = Beginning** - Project notes explain how to start the game. The goal is written on the first screen. The first screen explains how to start the game and which keys to use to control the game. The program is reset with a green flag so all sections of the game are in place for a replay of the game. At least one object (sprite) is controlled by the player. At least one object (sprite) moves independently (this could include objects that respond to mouse clicks, or it could be two objects that interact with each other.). Game has accurate measurement system. Game feedback for victory/loss and/or scoring is not clear, so player is unsure of progress and/or player cannot interact with game to a successful conclusion. Game runs with few errors.
 * **6 = Incomplete** - Project notes incomplete or lacking. Game goal unclear. Unclear which keys to use to control the game. Game not reset with green flag. Sprite not controlled by the player or one sprite not working independently. Errors in scoring or scoring lacking. Player unsure of progress.
 * **0 = Not Done** - Project not working or not transferred to MIT or link not provided to program.